7.8 CVE-2024-56608

Buffer Overflow Patch
 

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix out-of-bounds access in 'dcn21_link_encoder_create' An issue was identified in the dcn21_link_encoder_create function where an out-of-bounds access could occur when the hpd_source index was used to reference the link_enc_hpd_regs array. This array has a fixed size and the index was not being checked against the array's bounds before accessing it. This fix adds a conditional check to ensure that the hpd_source index is within the valid range of the link_enc_hpd_regs array. If the index is out of bounds, the function now returns NULL to prevent undefined behavior. References: [ 65.920507] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 65.920510] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/resource/dcn21/dcn21_resource.c:1312:29 [ 65.920519] index 7 is out of range for type 'dcn10_link_enc_hpd_registers [5]' [ 65.920523] CPU: 3 PID: 1178 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G OE 6.8.0-cleanershaderfeatureresetasdntipmi200nv2132 #13 [ 65.920525] Hardware name: AMD Majolica-RN/Majolica-RN, BIOS WMJ0429N_Weekly_20_04_2 04/29/2020 [ 65.920527] Call Trace: [ 65.920529] <TASK> [ 65.920532] dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x70 [ 65.920541] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 65.920543] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa2/0xe0 [ 65.920549] dcn21_link_encoder_create+0xd9/0x140 [amdgpu] [ 65.921009] link_create+0x6d3/0xed0 [amdgpu] [ 65.921355] create_links+0x18a/0x4e0 [amdgpu] [ 65.921679] dc_create+0x360/0x720 [amdgpu] [ 65.921999] ? dmi_matches+0xa0/0x220 [ 65.922004] amdgpu_dm_init+0x2b6/0x2c90 [amdgpu] [ 65.922342] ? console_unlock+0x77/0x120 [ 65.922348] ? dev_printk_emit+0x86/0xb0 [ 65.922354] dm_hw_init+0x15/0x40 [amdgpu] [ 65.922686] amdgpu_device_init+0x26a8/0x33a0 [amdgpu] [ 65.922921] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x1b/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ 65.923087] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x1b7/0x630 [amdgpu] [ 65.923087] local_pci_probe+0x4b/0xb0 [ 65.923087] pci_device_probe+0xc8/0x280 [ 65.923087] really_probe+0x187/0x300 [ 65.923087] __driver_probe_device+0x85/0x130 [ 65.923087] driver_probe_device+0x24/0x110 [ 65.923087] __driver_attach+0xac/0x1d0 [ 65.923087] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 65.923087] bus_for_each_dev+0x7d/0xd0 [ 65.923087] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [ 65.923087] bus_add_driver+0xf2/0x200 [ 65.923087] driver_register+0x64/0x130 [ 65.923087] ? __pfx_amdgpu_init+0x10/0x10 [amdgpu] [ 65.923087] __pci_register_driver+0x61/0x70 [ 65.923087] amdgpu_init+0x7d/0xff0 [amdgpu] [ 65.923087] do_one_initcall+0x49/0x310 [ 65.923087] ? kmalloc_trace+0x136/0x360 [ 65.923087] do_init_module+0x6a/0x270 [ 65.923087] load_module+0x1fce/0x23a0 [ 65.923087] init_module_from_file+0x9c/0xe0 [ 65.923087] ? init_module_from_file+0x9c/0xe0 [ 65.923087] idempotent_init_module+0x179/0x230 [ 65.923087] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x5d/0xa0 [ 65.923087] do_syscall_64+0x76/0x120 [ 65.923087] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 65.923087] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d80f1e88d [ 65.923087] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 73 b5 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 65.923087] RSP: 002b:00007ffc7bc1aa78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 65.923087] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000564c9c1db130 RCX: 00007f2d80f1e88d [ 65.923087] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000564c9c1e5480 RDI: 000000000000000f [ 65.923087] RBP: 0000000000040000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002 [ 65.923087] R10: 000000000000000f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000564c9c1e5480 [ 65.923087] R13: 0000564c9c1db260 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000564c9c1e54b0 [ 65.923087] </TASK> [ 65.923927] ---[ end trace ]---
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56608

Categories

CWE-129 : Improper Validation of Array Index
The product uses untrusted input when calculating or using an array index, but the product does not validate or incorrectly validates the index to ensure the index references a valid position within the array. The most common condition situation leading to an out-of-bounds array index is the use of loop index variables as buffer indexes. If the end condition for the loop is subject to a flaw, the index can grow or shrink unbounded, therefore causing a buffer overflow or underflow. Another common situation leading to this condition is the use of a function's return value, or the resulting value of a calculation directly as an index in to a buffer. This weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results. Black box methods might not get the needed code coverage within limited time constraints, and a dynamic test might not produce any noticeable side effects even if it is successful. Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173). Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow. Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations. large ID in packet used as array index negative array index as argument to POP LIST command Integer signedness error leads to negative array index product does not properly track a count and a maximum number, which can lead to resultant array index overflow. Chain: device driver for packet-capturing software allows access to an unintended IOCTL with resultant array index error. Chain: array index error (CWE-129) leads to deadlock (CWE-833)

References


 

CPE

cpe start end
Configuration 1
cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* < 6.12.5

REMEDIATION

Patch

Url
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63de35a8fcfca59ae8750d469a7eb220c7557baf
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f01ddd589e162979421e6914b1c74018633f01e0

EXPLOITS

Exploit-db.com

id description date
No known exploits

POC Github

Url
No known exploits

Other Nist (github, ...)

Url
No known exploits

CAPEC

Common Attack Pattern Enumerations and Classifications

id description severity
100 Overflow Buffers
Very High