7.5 CVE-2026-9064

Enriched by CISA DOS
 

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The get_ldapmessage_controls_ext() function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls within the default maximum BER message size (2 MB), causing excessive CPU consumption and heap allocation on the server. Under concurrent exploitation, this leads to significant latency degradation, worker thread starvation, or out-of-memory termination, resulting in a denial of service.
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9064

Categories

CWE-770 : Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Manual static analysis can be useful for finding this weakness, but it might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints. If denial-of-service is not considered a significant risk, or if there is strong emphasis on consequences such as code execution, then manual analysis may not focus on this weakness at all. Certain automated dynamic analysis techniques may be effective in producing side effects of uncontrolled resource allocation problems, especially with resources such as processes, memory, and connections. The technique may involve generating a large number of requests to the product within a short time frame. Manual analysis is likely required to interpret the results. Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits. Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410. Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold. For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them. Chain: Python library does not limit the resources used to process images that specify a very large number of bands (CWE-1284), leading to excessive memory consumption (CWE-789) or an integer overflow (CWE-190). Language interpreter does not restrict the number of temporary files being created when handling a MIME request with a large number of parts.. Driver does not use a maximum width when invoking sscanf style functions, causing stack consumption. Large integer value for a length property in an object causes a large amount of memory allocation. Product allows exhaustion of file descriptors when processing a large number of TCP packets. Communication product allows memory consumption with a large number of SIP requests, which cause many sessions to be created. Product allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a large number of directives, each of which opens a separate window. CMS does not restrict the number of searches that can occur simultaneously, leading to resource exhaustion. web application scanner attempts to read an excessively large file created by a user, causing process termination Go-based workload orchestrator does not limit resource usage with unauthenticated connections, allowing a DoS by flooding the service

References

0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26452
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26453
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26454
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26455
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26456
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26457
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26458
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26459
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26460
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26461
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26463
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26464
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26465
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26597
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26599
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26639
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27125
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9064
Mitigation Vendor Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480093
Issue Tracking Vendor Advisory
https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-9064.json

secalert@redhat.com

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26452
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26453
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26454
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26455
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26456
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26457
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26458
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26459
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26460
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26461
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26463
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26464
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26465
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26597
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26599
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26639
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:27125
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9064
Mitigation Vendor Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480093
Issue Tracking Vendor Advisory


 

AFFECTED (from MITRE)


Vendor Product Versions
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.5 E4S for RHEL 8
  • 8060020260609102432.0ca98e7e < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.7 E4S for RHEL 8
  • 8080020260610130252.f969626e < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.9 for RHEL 8
  • 8100020260601104139.37ed7c03 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.2 E4S for RHEL 9
  • 9020020260615123354.1674d574 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.4 E4S for RHEL 9
  • 9040020260611130021.1674d574 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • 0:3.2.0-7.el10_2 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support
  • 0:3.0.6-18.el10_0 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
  • 0:1.3.11.1-12.el7_9 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • 8100020260601102239.25e700aa < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
  • 8040020260609102422.96015a92 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
  • 8040020260609102422.96015a92 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
  • 8060020260609102416.824efc52 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
  • 8060020260609102416.824efc52 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service
  • 8080020260610125847.6dbb3803 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
  • 8080020260610125847.6dbb3803 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • 0:2.8.0-7.el9_8 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions
  • 0:2.2.4-18.el9_2 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions
  • 0:2.4.5-25.el9_4 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support
  • 0:2.6.1-21.el9_6 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 13.2
  • 1781714123 < * [unaffected]
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12
    Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 13
      Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
        © 2022 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

        CPE

        cpe start end
        Configuration 1
        cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:12.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:13.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:389_directory_server:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
        cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*


        REMEDIATION




        EXPLOITS


        Exploit-db.com

        id description date
        No known exploits

        POC Github

        Url
        No known exploits

        Other Nist (github, ...)

        Url
        No known exploits


        CAPEC


        Common Attack Pattern Enumerations and Classifications

        id description severity
        125 Flooding
        Medium
        130 Excessive Allocation
        Medium
        147 XML Ping of the Death
        Medium
        197 Exponential Data Expansion
        Medium
        229 Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
        High
        230 Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
        High
        231 Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
        High
        469 HTTP DoS
        Low
        482 TCP Flood
        486 UDP Flood
        487 ICMP Flood
        488 HTTP Flood
        489 SSL Flood
        490 Amplification
        491 Quadratic Data Expansion
        493 SOAP Array Blowup
        494 TCP Fragmentation
        495 UDP Fragmentation
        496 ICMP Fragmentation
        528 XML Flood
        Medium


        MITRE


        Techniques

        id description
        T1498.001 Network Denial of Service: Direct Network Flood
        T1498.002 Network Denial of Service:Reflection Amplification
        T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service
        T1499.001 Endpoint Denial of Service: OS Exhaustion Flood
        T1499.002 Endpoint Denial of Service: Service Exhaustion Flood
        T1499.003 Endpoint Denial of Service:Application Exhaustion Flood
        © 2022 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation.

        Mitigations

        id description
        M1037 When flood volumes exceed the capacity of the network connection being targeted, it is typically necessary to intercept the incoming traffic upstream to filter out the attack traffic from the legitimate traffic. Such defenses can be provided by the hosting Internet Service Provider (ISP) or by a 3rd party such as a Content Delivery Network (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations. Depending on flood volume, on-premises filtering may be possible by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport. As immediate response may require rapid engagement of 3rd parties, analyze the risk associated to critical resources being affected by Network DoS attacks and create a disaster recovery plan/business continuity plan to respond to incidents.
        M1037 When flood volumes exceed the capacity of the network connection being targeted, it is typically necessary to intercept the incoming traffic upstream to filter out the attack traffic from the legitimate traffic. Such defenses can be provided by the hosting Internet Service Provider (ISP) or by a 3rd party such as a Content Delivery Network (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations. Depending on flood volume, on-premises filtering may be possible by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport. As immediate response may require rapid engagement of 3rd parties, analyze the risk associated to critical resources being affected by Network DoS attacks and create a disaster recovery plan/business continuity plan to respond to incidents.
        M1037 Leverage services provided by Content Delivery Networks (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations to filter traffic upstream from services. Filter boundary traffic by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport. To defend against SYN floods, enable SYN Cookies.
        M1037 Leverage services provided by Content Delivery Networks (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations to filter traffic upstream from services. Filter boundary traffic by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport. To defend against SYN floods, enable SYN Cookies.
        M1037 Leverage services provided by Content Delivery Networks (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations to filter traffic upstream from services. Filter boundary traffic by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport.
        M1037 Leverage services provided by Content Delivery Networks (CDN) or providers specializing in DoS mitigations to filter traffic upstream from services. Filter boundary traffic by blocking source addresses sourcing the attack, blocking ports that are being targeted, or blocking protocols being used for transport.
        © 2022 The MITRE Corporation. Esta obra se reproduce y distribuye con el permiso de The MITRE Corporation.